| 1,321 | 42 | 55 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
采用中国土壤流失方程和冻融侵蚀强度评价模型,研究西南高山峡谷区水力和冻融侵蚀强度在不同地形地质条件和土地利用类型间的分布特征,并揭示其空间分异规律。研究结果表明:西南高山峡谷区以水力侵蚀为主,兼有冻融侵蚀,总体上呈东部量大级强、西部量少级弱、南部水蚀、北部冻融的空间分布格局;区内3 500 m以上高山和15°以上陡坡以轻度及以上侵蚀为主,但强烈和极强烈水力侵蚀在2 000~3 500 m的中山带分布最多,冻融侵蚀则几乎全部分布于高山带;岩溶地质占全区总面积的35.48%,其中21.74%存在轻度及以上侵蚀,较非岩溶区高10.27%;草地和林地占全区面积的90.47%,共分布41.47%的轻度及以上侵蚀面积,而仅占全区面积2.12%的耕地,却分布31.54%的轻度及以上侵蚀面积。
Abstract:The distribution characteristics of hydraulic and freeze-thaw erosion intensity under different topographic, geological conditions and land use types in the southwest alpine canyon area of China were studied by the Chinese Soil Loss Equation and the freeze-thaw erosion intensity evaluation model, and the spatial differentiation patterns were revealed. The results showed that: The soil erosion in the southwest alpine canyon area is mainly dominated by hydraulic erosion, accompanied by freeze-thaw erosion. Soil erosion generally shows a spatial distribution pattern of great amount and severe level in the east, low amount and week level in the west, and hydraulic erosion in the south and freeze-thaw erosion in the north. The mild or above soil erosion is mainly distributed in the alpine zone with an altitude of 3 500 m or above and the steep area with slope of 15° or above, but the intensive and extremely intensive hydraulic erosion is the mostly distributed in the mid-mountain zone of 2 000-3 500 m, while freeze-thaw erosion is almost entirely distributed in the alpine zone. The karst geology accounts for 35.48% of the total area, and there is 21.74% of the soil erosion here exceeds the mild level, which is 10.27% higher than that in the non-karst area. Grassland and forest account for 90.47% of the total area, and 41.47% of soil erosion that exceeds the mild level is distributed in this area. The cultivated land only accounts for 2.12% in the region, while 31.54% of the soil erosion exceeds mild level.
[1] Lal P,Pimentel D.Soil erosion:a carbon sink or source?[J].Science,2008,319(5866):1040-1041.
[2] 郭达,宋小宁,董震,等.基于RUSLE与GIS的黄土高原水土流失评价研究——以宁夏中卫地区为例[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(5):55-60.
[3] 俱战省,严冬春,文安邦,等.三峡库区菱角塘小流域土壤侵蚀量和泥沙输移比研究[J].泥沙研究,2018,43(2):67-72.
[4] 范建容,刘飞,宫奎方,等.基于GIS的藏东横断山区土壤侵蚀分布特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(4):144-149.
[5] 张素,熊东红,吴汉,等.基于RUSLE模型的孙水河流域土壤侵蚀空间分异特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):24-30.
[6] 全国水土保持规划编制工作领导小组办公室,水利部水利水电规划设计总院.中国水土保持区划[M].北京:中国水利水电科学出版社,2016.
[7] 中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.横断山区自然地理[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.
[8] 《第一次全国水利普查成果丛书》编委会.水土保持情况普查报告[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2017.
[9] Fischer G,Nachtergaele F,Prieler S,et al.Global agro-ecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008) [J].IIASA,Laxenburg,Austria and FAO,Rome,Italy,2008,10.
[10] Zhang X,Liu L Y,Chen X D,et al.GLC_FCS30:global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery [J].Earth System Science Data,2021,13:2753-2776.
[11] Xie Y,Yin S Q,Liu B Y,et al.Models for estimating daily rainfall erosivity in China [J].Journal of Hydrology,2016,535:547e558.
[12] Sharpley A N,Williams J R.EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator (2):User manual [J].Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture,1990,4(4):206-207.
[13] Foster G R,Wischmeier W H.Evaluating irregular slope for soil loss prediction [J].Transaction of ASAE,1974,17:305-309.
[14] McCool D K,Brown L C,Foster G R,et al.Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation [J].Transaction of the ASAE,1987,30(5):1387-1396.
[15] Liu B Y,Nearing M A,Risse L M.Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes [J].Transactions of the ASAE,1994,37(6):1835-1840.
[16] 符素华,刘宝元,周贵云,等.坡长坡度因子计算工具[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):105-110.
[17] 周立刚,刘卉芳,王昭艳,等.岩溶峰丛洼地水土流失机理及防治技术研究进展[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(2):66-73.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2023.06.008
中图分类号:S157.1
引用信息:
[1]丁琳,黄婷婷,秦伟,等.西南高山峡谷区土壤侵蚀空间分异特征[J].泥沙研究,2023,48(06):51-58+66.DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2023.06.008.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1302902)
2023-09-12
2023
2023-09-26
2023-10-27
2023
1
2023-10-30
2023-10-30
2023-10-30