| 147 | 0 | 169 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
通常以利津站3 000 m3/s水位作为黄河下游的相对侵蚀基准面,利津水位的升降影响黄河下游的河道冲淤。利津水位的升降不仅受到来水来沙的影响,还与尾闾河长有关。从水流功率角度出发,提出了利津3 000 m3/s流量水位的滞后响应计算方法,较好地模拟了1955—2019年利津水位的历时变化过程,揭示了不同因素对利津水位升降的影响机制。研究还显示,2000年后,利津水位与前期5年滑动平均来沙系数呈显著正相关线性关系,决定系数在0.88以上。小浪底水库运用后,虽然黄河口行河流路尾闾河长持续延伸,但是由于来水量增加,同时来沙量显著减少并保持低值,导致利津断面持续冲刷,利津水位下降。
Abstract:The water level of Lijin at the discharge of 3000m3/s is often taken as the erosion base level at the Lower Yellow River, the variation of the water level has an influence on the erosion and deposition of the LowerYellow River. However, the rise and fall of the water level at Lijin is not only affected by incoming water and sediment, but also is related to the length of the tail channel. From the perspective of stream power, the delayed response calculation method has been proposed, by which the continuous variation process of water level at Lijin from 1955 to 2019 is well simulated and the underlying influence mechanism of different factors on the rise and fall of Lijin water level has been revealed. The study also shows that after 2000, there is a significant positive linear relationship between the water level at Lijin and the previous 5-year moving average incoming sediment coefficient, with determination coefficient over 0.88. After the operation of Xiaolangdi Reservoir, the tail channel length extended continuously, whereas the water volume inflow increases over time, and the sediment load decreases significantly and maintains at a low value, which leading to continuous erosion in the Lijin section, and the decrease in Lijin water level consequently.
[1] 钱宁.河床演变学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[2] 杜小康,王开荣,窦身堂,等.黄河河口河段水位波动的特征研究[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(3):74-80.
[3] 吴保生,郑珊.河床演变的滞后响应理论与应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2015.
[4] 王恺忱.黄河河口的演变与治理[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2010.
[5] 郑珊,谈广鸣,吴保生,等.利津水位对河口演变响应的计算方法[J].水利学报,2015,46(3):315-325.
[6] 韩其为.小浪底水库初期运用及黄河调水调沙研究[J].泥沙研究,2008(3):1-18.
[7] 刘晓芳,王党伟,吉祖稳,等.黄河口尾闾河道冲淤及其影响因素分析[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(5):42-47.
[8] 周志德.黄河河口三角洲海岸的发育及其对上游河道的影响[J].海洋与湖沼,1980(3):211-219.
[9] 费祥俊.黄河下游来水来沙对河槽形态与河型的塑造作用[J].泥沙研究,2016(4):9-14.
[10] 谢鉴衡.河床演变及整治[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2013.
[11] WU B S,ZHENG S,THORNE C R.A general framework for using the rate law to simulate morphological response to disturbance in the fluvial system [J].Progress in Physical Geography,2012,36(5):575-597.
[12] 沈逸,郑珊,吴保生.基于滞后响应模型的三门峡水库冲淤计算方法[J].水利学报,2022,53(10):1207-1217.
[13] 吴保生,申冠卿.来沙系数物理意义的探讨[J].人民黄河,2008(4):15-16.
[14] 王远见,王强,刘彦晖,等.小浪底水库运行以来对黄河下游河道河床演变特性的影响[J].水利学报,2024,55(5):505-515.
[15] 程亦菲,夏军强,周美蓉,等.黄河下游不同河段分组悬沙输移对河床冲淤的影响[J].水科学进展,2022,33(3):506-517.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2025.03.005
中图分类号:TV147
引用信息:
[1]沈逸,马子普,张原锋,等.利津水位变化过程模拟及影响因素分析[J].泥沙研究,2025,50(03):30-36+24.DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2025.03.005.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(U2243218)