| 86 | 0 | 92 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
基于乌东德水库2013—2023年断面实测数据,分析了不同时期库区河道冲淤演变特性。结果表明:天然时期,受金沙江中游及雅砻江水库拦沙影响,干流河道整体呈微冲态势,空间上呈“上冲下淤”的特点。施工期,河道整体微淤,但“上冲下淤”的空间分布特征不变。水库运行期,干支流共淤积泥沙5 583.6万m3,淤损死库容0.95%,侵占调节库容0.21%;干流纵向上呈“中间大,两端小”的淤积分布,垂向上以死库容淤积为主;由于区间来沙作用,干流深泓纵剖面抬升较为均匀;受上游来沙与干流倒灌影响,支流河口以龙川江淤积最多,河口段平均抬高2.6 m;雅砻江微冲,河口段平均切深0.1 m。
Abstract:Based on the measurements of cross-section in the Wudongde Reservoir between 2013 and 2023, this study analyzes the evolution of the characteristics of river channel erosion and sedimentation in different periods. The results indicate that during the natural period, influenced by sediment trapping effects of reservoirs in the middle reaches of the Jinsha River and the Yalongjiang River, the main river channel is in slight erosion overall and can be spatially characterized by “upstream erosion and downstream sedimentation” During the construction phase, the spatial distribution pattern of “upstream erosion and downstream sedimentation” remains unchanged, but the river channel exhibits overall slight sedimentation. During the reservoir operation phase, a total of 55.836 million m3 of sediment has been deposited in the main and tributary channels, which resulting in a sedimentation loss of 0.95% of the dead storage capacity and an encroachment of 0.21% of the regulation storage capacity. The reservoir sedimentation can be characterized by “larger in the middle and smaller at both ends in longitudinal”, and primarily deposition is in the dead storage capacity in vertical. Influenced by upstream sediment influx and backflow from the main stream, the Longchuan River estuary experiences the most significant sedimentation among tributary mouths, with the average deposition of 2.6 m in the estuary sections. The Yalong River is in slight erosion with the average erosion of 0.1 m in the estuary sections.
[1] 冯鑫.金沙江下游泥石流沟道裂点对其发育特征的影响研究[D].绵阳:西南科技大学,2024.
[2] 徐黎明.基于突变理论的乌东德水电站近坝区泥石流风险评价与防治研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.
[3] 柴宗新,范建容.金沙江下游侵蚀强烈原因探讨[J].水土保持学报,2001(增刊1):14-17.
[4] 谭寓宁,刘怀湘,陆永军.金沙江下游区间来沙驱动因子分析及产沙预测模型[J].水科学进展,2023,34(2):277-289.
[5] 黄仁勇,舒彩文,谈广鸣.长江上游梯级水库泥沙冲淤长期预测初步研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2018,26(4):737-745.
[6] 谢益芹,邓安军,董先勇,等.金沙江下游流域水沙格局变化研究[J].水利学报,2023,54(11):1309-1322.
[7] 张国帅,邓安军,张帮稳,等.水库运用对金沙江下游水沙变化的影响[J].湖泊科学,2024,36(6):1911-1921.
[8] 朱玲玲,陈迪,杨成刚,等.金沙江下游梯级水库泥沙淤积和坝下河道冲刷规律[J].湖泊科学,2023,35(3):1097-1110.
[9] 袁隆湖,陆永军,刘怀湘,等.山区河流宽级配泥沙生态环境效应研究进展[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2024,32(2):442-460.
[10] 罗刚,肖潇,吴迪,等.白鹤滩库区水沙变化及冲淤特性研究[J].长江科学院院报,2025,42(8):38-43.
[11] 张地继,陈根,陈柯兵,等.白鹤滩水库水沙特征及支流黑水河来沙影响分析[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(6):75-78.
[12] 杜泽东,董先勇,张锋,等.金沙江溪洛渡水库水沙特征及泥沙冲淤规律[J].泥沙研究,2022,47(2):22-28.
[13] 冯胜航,邓安军,王党伟,等.溪洛渡水库泥沙淤积特性分析[J].泥沙研究,2021,46(6):16-22.
[14] 张帮稳,邓安军,王党伟,等.溪洛渡库区支流拦门沙形成机理[J].水科学进展,2023,34(6):928-937.
[15] 尹晔,王党伟,冯胜航,等.向家坝水电站库区泥沙淤积特性[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(7):71-75.
[16] 冯志毅,邓安军,陆琴,等.向家坝水电站下游河道冲淤演变规律[J].泥沙研究,2025,50(4):1-8.
[17] 杜泽东,秦蕾蕾,董先勇.金沙江向家坝水电站下游河道2020年淤积成因分析[J].泥沙研究,2024,49(1):45-50.
[18] 於三大,陈松生,董先勇,等.金沙江下游梯级水电站水文泥沙监测与研究[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2022.
[19] 申冠卿,姜乃迁,张原锋,等.黄河下游断面法与沙量法冲淤计算成果比较及输沙率资料修正[J].泥沙研究,2006(1):32-37.
[20] 舒彩文,谈广鸣.河道冲淤量计算方法研究进展[J].泥沙研究,2009(4):68-73.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2026.03.005
中图分类号:TV145
引用信息:
[1]路子岩,邓安军,董先勇,等.乌东德水库蓄水前后泥沙冲淤特性分析[J].泥沙研究,2026,51(03):33-40.DOI:10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2026.03.005.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(U2040217,U2340223)
2026-05-20
2026-05-20
2026-05-20